1.26.2008

Drunk People Are Funny

Since yesterday was my birthday, we all went out and celebrated the way any good, self-respecting American citizen does - by getting wasted. At one point, I was sitting talking to my friend Chris, who is an English major, and telling him that we should collaborate on a piece of literature. As a response, we created these two lists on a napkin, which I will now reproduce verbatim, as per numerous requests.

Crazy shit you could feed a dog:
  • beers
  • birth certificates
  • a babies
  • drugs
  • another dog!
  • your wedding album
  • several balloons
  • a dildo!
  • onions
  • hamsters
  • a horse
  • toothpicks
  • A Pulitzer-Prize-Winning Novel
  • Eudora Welty
  • Bacteria Cultures
    -----> Yogurt
  • Cunt*
  • The Crew of the S.S. Minnow
  • Itself
  • Captain Picard
  • "Personal Lubricant"
  • BET...the entire channel
  • Elephant shit
  • Bill Nye the Science Guy
  • Bouncy Balls
*-added by Deb

Things you should beat off to/with:
  • 2girls1cup
  • Midgets
  • Donkey Show?
  • Paula Deen
  • Angry Bartender (Brandy)
  • "Ace of Spades"
  • BET
  • Tax Refunds
  • Nicole's 30 Victoria Secrets
  • Jason's Playboy Offer (Blacksburg or Dumfries edition)
  • Sears Catalog
  • Kirks uncircumsized penis
  • Paula Dean's vagina (she loves butter)
  • (with) cooking spray
  • Paula's Dean buttery vagina
  • (with) Slip N' slides <----- accidental boner
  • (with) Peanut Butter (chunky is like ribbed for my pleasure)

1.22.2008

A Match Made in Heaven

Now, it's probably a bad idea to admit to any degree of pyromania whatsoever, but especially so in such a public way. If there's any sort of half-crazed jackass with a Zippo and gasoline who's up for torching anything around here, I'd hate for the Cops to try pinning it on me. But I do have a strange fascination for lighting up matches for seemingly no reason at all.

When you're a kid, you're always told not to play with matches. You could shoot your eye out, after all. Er, you could burn the house down. Point is, it's in the same realm as trying on women's clothing - the realm of the forbidden. And if you've ever played with matches as a kid, the thrill is that of merely doing something you're not supposed to be doing. Though I'm not sure how the thrill of trying on high heels would measure up.

Well, personally, I never did any of that shit. I was too straight-laced to disobey the rules. Instead, I had to wait to start thinking philosophically before matches really became fun for me. Just try thinking about the scenario for a second. Here you are with virtually nothing; matches are free for the taking at fine drinking establishments across the country. And with one skillful, yet simple hand motion, you've got instant fire. The same shit that cavemen had to master. In a split second, you've imposed a remarkable change with no effort whatsoever.

As you probably know, I've been thinking a lot about politics with the upcoming election at the end of the year. While the candidates are still duking it out, I figured I'd try to figure out where I stand ideologically speaking. So I Googled political quizzes, and here's one of the results. Further investigation of the quiz site reveals that I'm in the same quadrant as Nelson Mandela, Beethoven, Gandhi, and the Dalai Lama. Now that's good company to have. If you've ever heard the 9th symphony, you know what I'm talking about.

Then I found this map of where the 2008 candidates lie on the same plane, based on their stated platforms. While I'm in the libertarian left, everyone else is in the authoritarian right. Note that I'm not counting Kucinich or Gravel as having a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected.

Now I'm hardly saying that everyone should be on my side, but it's sort of disheartening to see that everyone else is really all in the same category: the one directly opposite mine. Clinton and Obama, both of whom strike fear in the hearts of Republicans, are still on their side of the playing field, as far as the whole of Western Democracy is concerned. What this map truly reveals is that if there is this much heated contention amongst the candidates over such a narrow band of the 2-D spectrum, then what sort of effort would it take to elect an American president who's on my side - or even someone who's right in the middle, one of those beautiful, perfect-minded people who are less plentiful than unicorns these days?

If you haven't figured out the connection yet, politics is sort of like the antithesis of the matches I keep lighting up. This election won't be over until November, and even then, the President-elect won't take office until January. All that time time waiting for either no change, or what seems to my eyes to be not enough change. This lethargic beast of politics is so perfectly contrasted with a crack and sizzle of a kitchen match. As the puff of smoke vanishes, I can extinguish the young, dynamic flame with one puff of air, as if to say, "that wasn't so hard now, was it?"

I could go on, wishing that a change was so simple. I could go on wasting my time thinking about politics. I could go on lighting matches here in the dark. But instead, it's time to take off this women's clothing so I can go to bed.

1.13.2008

Hey, I Didn't Have To Pay For It

They say a writer writes. Always. Actually, when I say "they," I think I'm just quoting the movie Throw Momma from the Train. Anyway, as the onset of a new semester of work looms large, I'm concerned that I may suddenly become less creative. In recent days, writing on this blog has become a much more common activity for me. It's either that or watching a movie, reading, or what is most likely - wasting time on my computer doing other, pointless things.

So what will my topic be tonight? I have been thinking a lot lately about last spring's trip to an engineering conference out in San Diego. It would seem to be a logical choice, given that I spent a few days hanging out with Brian, whom I mentioned in the last post.

It was an engineering conference, meaning that I was automatically out of my element, despite being an engineering grad student. On the whole, engineering researchers are of a certain personality disposition - that is, they don't really have a personality to speak of. When a group of them meet together and you happen to be in the middle of it, take a deep breath and embrace your impending deep emotional torture.

One of the first things I noticed as I registered for the conference was that there were a lot of Asians there. I've noticed that many Asians tend to associate with each other, since they share a common background, and very possibly a common language. I don't hold any sort of negative view of foreigners at all, but it's slightly discouraging whenever you see a group of people speaking a language you don't understand. You are and shall forever be an outsider by design.

Anyway, I spent most of the conference pretending to be interested in the presentations that were being given. At this point in my career, at least, everything that I haven't studied in great detail is highly esoteric and foreign to me. Somebody could mention something like "non-destructive intermittent thermal waves" and I'd just go with it, assuming they know what they're talking about. I always hated thermodynamics, which is what it sounds like to me. All I can do is hope that their Powerpoint images are plentiful and colorful enough to convey the basic gist of what they're trying to say.

Is this the sad life I've chosen for myself? Working months to put together a fifteen-minute presentation that maybe three people in the room understand? Well, a glimmer of hope came in the form of my former research supervisor, who arrived the day before our presentation was to be given. He told me that he would present it. He then explained that this was not because of any sort of doubt of my presentation abilities, but because he hadn't put it together yet.

Whereas most researchers had been rehearsing their presentations since the conference began, this man had established himself as my hero by procrastinating until beyond the very end and pulling a true all-nighter to create something from nothing by the deadline of the following morning. I promptly was very grateful that I didn't have to give the presentation, and went out for dinner in the Gaslamp Quarter. The point is, though, that my old boss hadn't conformed to the boring habits of everyone else in the world of research.

I've always tried to balance my engineering experiences with other pursuits. I ended up minoring in philosophy so that I'd have plenty of what I called "sanity classes" - easy A's that had nothing to do with any class in my major. Hopefully, I'll be able to retain that relaxed attitude and personality of mine as I start to delve deeper into the world of academia. I will try my hardest not to let these conformers to the nerdy, pensive engineering paradigm corrupt me. It might not be that hard, though, because I can't understand them in the first place. I think they're speaking Asian.

1.11.2008

Margin Release

I've talked before about being a lover of all things vintage. Razors, pipes, and funny-looking hats. You should probably add another long-lost member to this list - the typewriter. It should really come as no surprise, being that my blog is named the Monkey's Typewriter. And that I've switched to this tacky Courier font. Do yourself a favor and get a real typewriter font.

Anyway, my love for the typewriter comes from my close association with my late grandmother, who would always use her trusty Smith-Corona Super Sterling to create her correspondence. I still maintain that her handwriting was barely legible to anyone outside the house, so it was a good thing to have around. I even typed my first book report on it, in those last few years before we got a computer. It had to be typed, and I couldn't work on it anywhere else, so what choice did I have? Anyway, ever since she passed, I had been meaning to dig it out of the closet and use it again.

My golden chance came when I realized that I haven't really been in touch with my good friend Brian, who has by now sold his soul - or at least part of it - to the dreaded Real World. He's out in California, the veritable Neverland of weirdness, Democrats, movie stars, and common chaos. How I envy him.

Anyway, he and I have been sort of literary cohorts ever since we met. We were both mechanical engineering students, and we both hated the restrictive nature of the major and the profession to come. I actually met him in Philosophy Club, and mutual homework assignments forced the friendship to grow. We became such good friends that future historians - those who bitterly regret having been assigned to such losers - will probably mistake us for closet homosexuals. I guess that happens when you make a prolonged series of dick jokes every time you see each other.

Well, since we both have a decidedly literary mindset, we met up in San Diego when I was doing an engineering conference and talked about philosophy, literature and the like. I'm pretty sure this was after his trip to India. Last time we talked about it, he was planning to write a book about that trip. From what he described, it could be a profound book, if he's able to execute it well.

But it's been quite a while since we sent each other any messages, much less talked. I imagined he'd probably be getting stuck into some boring rut by now, so I got the typewriter out and wrote him a letter. What struck me as odd was his e-mail response to my question of whether he received it:

"I got it two days ago. You will not hear from me again via e-mail - unless there is an emergency. Respond with your address (so that I have a record) and keep an eye on your mailbox."

This is indicative of two distinct possible scenarios. He could be on the run from the law, worried that every electronic move he makes could be completely traceable and a catalyst towards his imminent incarceration. Either that, or my typewritten letter has sparked some sort of reclusive instict leading him to shun post-1973 technology. I think this is probably the more likely scenario, so I look forward to receiving a letter of reply instead of a letterbomb.

So now I've purchased an electric typewriter for $5 online. Hooray for eBay. I've always appreciated receiving stuff in the mail that isn't either junk or a bill, and I imagine he does, too. Maybe you, dear reader, do too. Maybe you should start writing some real letters for a change, like us. If you're a friend of mine, who knows? Maybe I'll be sending you a letter soon, too. If you ask nicely, maybe I'll even throw in a few dick jokes.

1.06.2008

I'll Drink to That

One topic of particular interest as 2008 begins is the wide world of politics. On January 3, I could not escape the coverage of the Iowa caucuses. Nor did I want to. I had been trained well by the media to be come a politics junkie.

Well, I shouldn't really claim to be a junkie. I occasionally get excited and passionate about politics, but not as much as some - even those within my own age group. While I do like to keep up with current events, such as the latest Virginia Tech football player to have a run-in with the law, I rarely follow every detail about politics. I guess part of my lack of enthusiasm stems from a belief that not much hope is present in the political realm. No matter who's in office, history suggests they're doing a horrible job. Maybe part of it is a desire to find the nonexistent middle ground for which so few people are willing to search. A friend of mine is a strong supporter of the ideological middle, but so few politicians are on his side. Funny, since it's not really a side at all. It's more like the fulcrum of a see-saw with two ugly kids on either side.

These two sentiments - hopelessness and the alienation of sensible compromise - are shared by a lot of people. Either the system does not work or it's so absurd and polarized that common sense can't help you. If this sounds similar to recent lines of your own thinking, then might I suggest a reevaluation of your perspective? After all, we tend to get to engrossed in our pessimism when watching the news on television. I get particularly pessimistic whenever I go home and am inevitably forced to watch Fox News. Hey, it's my grandfather's remote control, not mine. Anyway, back to gaining a fresh perspective. It's really just a two step process:

Step 1. Leave the country. Ideally, you already have a passport and a few thousand dollars, so this should be a piece of cake. I'd recommend visiting Europe. Many people will look past the fact that you're American and instead love using you as a tool to practice their English. People helping people.

Step 2. Drink alcohol with a bunch of foreigners. Odds are they'll pity you rather than hate you for being American if you can somehow show that you've got an open mind. If you can't think of anything original, just say that you hate George Bush. That usually works.

It sounds simple - since there are only two steps - but it works. When I was in Ireland, I met a very nice guy from Iran. Tensions were (and remain) high between our respective governments, but he and I got along perfectly. Politics came up more than once, but rather than get into a heated conflict, we both offered observations about our governments from a citizen's point of view. I think it really helped that we both hated our elected representatives. The point is, it was friendly discourse rather than some political fistfight. It really began to teach me that the global community is really just a huge collective group of different people. It doesn't really matter where you're from or what religion you are. We'll probably still be able to enjoy a beer downtown.

Speaking of which, that friend I mentioned before had a similar experience. He was out drinking with a bunch of students from a number of countries formerly of the Soviet Union, as well as a guy who had grown up in East Germany. A mere fifteen years prior, that likely would have been impossible. I guess the moral of his story is that though it rarely seems like it, we are occasionally making progress towards realizing that we're all not that different. We all share the same Earth. We all wish to see peace prevail. We all like beer.

1.05.2008

Behind The Music

I would not recommend reading too much Hunter S. Thompson in one sitting. If you're anything like me, then he fills you with a strong desire to write something. It's not necessarily good if you're trying to get to sleep so you can drive five hours back to your apartment in Blacksburg the next day. But now I'm almost halfway through the biography that I got for Christmas, and I have to type something. It got me thinking about my own biography, and thus, music.

I grew up without music, really. I didn't get into listening to popular music until 1999. That was when I started taking guitar lessons in the summer. My logic, naturally, was that this would make me cool. Only later did I find out that coolness actually came from being in a band. And by then I had become so frustrated by not being in one that I settled for being the bass player. And bass players aren't cool outside of the small circle of sad, pathetic music fans (e.g., High Fidelity) that can truly appreciate the rare talented bass player.

Anyway, the reason that I didn't listen to any popular music before 1999 was that my dad's car stereo was stolen when I was a kid. He never did get it replaced, and whoever broke into the car also took the CDs. I had just received my first CD, Ren & Stimpy's seminal 1993 album, You Eediot!. It was my first exposure to rip-offs of the cover of Abbey Road.

But what I do remember from the CDs that my dad had, he was into the metal of the late 80's. The very first song I remember vividly was Mötley Crüe's "Dr. Feelgood." The song and the band have become popular again, thanks to that wave of 80's nostalgia that still hasn't evaporated. I guess it's a good thing, though, or else I would have never seen Scarface. Man, the amount of "f-bombs" that were dropped in that movie somehow gives me hope for the future of humanity.

The only other CD that I remember in my Dad's collection was Warrant's classic debut, Dirty Rotten Filthy Stinking Rich. I remember absolutely nothing about this album other than its cover. I remember sneaking into my dad's room just so I could look at it. At first, it was really scary to little six-year-old me. I mean, there's a huge Mangino-esque businessman smoking a dollar bill cigar with an evil look on his fat face. Then it became pretty cool, for exactly the same reasons.

Looking back on things, maybe it was a good thing that my music youth was robbed. Now that I'm forced to revisit the 90's ex post facto, I'm taking a very active role in finding and listening to the music that I missed out on. I just found out about My Bloody Valentine before Christmas break, and they ruled. I imagine that if I had that CD player in dad's car, I would have only been exposed to Smashing Pumpkins, one of the bands they influenced. I probably would have gotten into the whole mainstream alternative scene, and after that dried up in the mid-to-late 90's, I'd end up listening to whatever "hard rock" Creed-esque bullshit the radio continued to feed me.

Thinking back on Hunter, he was a key member of the scene of the 60's, when the addiction of the masses was drugs. From what I'm reading, they were pretty accepted and tolerated, especially around the head honchos of Rolling Stone magazine. It was mostly harmless, and there wasn't really a firm idea of what their consequences were. For our generation, music is an alternative addiction that's almost a direct parallel. It's pretty well-known that music downloading is fairly widespread. (For the record, I still purchase CDs, and everyone I've talked to does as well. The reason the music industry is truly in decline is because a majority of today's music sucks.) But back to the point of this closing paragraph, I'm sure that a music addiction beats a drug addiction any day of the week. Especially if that day is the day the Columbian cartel comes into your mansion and fills you with lead. Man, I fuckin' need to watch fuckin' Scarface again. Fuck.

1.02.2008

Smoke Signals

Coolness is officially dying in France.

With the coming of the new year, France has now banned smoking in bars, cafes, and hotels. It's almost the definition of unbelievable. France banning smoking is like Washington, D.C. banning hypocrisy or New York City banning foreign cab drivers or the use of the word "fuck."

Don't get me wrong - smoking is definitely a serious issue. It's a known carcinogen, and it produces a strong chemical addiction. I personally also happen to think smoking is disgusting. I remember when my late grandmother used to smoke in the living room. I hated it, and whenever I would pass by on my way to either my bedroom or the den, I would put on this dramatic performance wherein I would hold my breath, pinch my nose, and sprint by. After a while, my grandmother got the hint. Fortunately, her habit was very casual and there was no difficulty in her quitting.

However, you have to admit that there's an image factor when smoking. There are cool-as-hell smoky jazz clubs, for example. And without cigarettes, what images would we have of Audrey Hepburn, Hunter S. Thompson, and Garfield the Cat? Wait, maybe that's lasagna. Anyway, the point is, that tobacco smoking has always come across as cool for some reason. Sherlock Holmes was pretty pimp solving all those crimes, but the icing on the cake is that pipe he smokes. It's too bad that they can't see who will be coming after them once they commit the crime. If I knew a pipe-smoking badass was going to hunt me down, I'd leave Old Ms. Farnesworth alone and not kill her for her family fortune.

Anyway, the point is that if Sherlock Holmes now wants to walk in to a Parisian cafe, he'd have to take that pipe outside. After he gets laughed at, of course, for those Victorian clothes he's wearing. I think France has to rethink this whole ban. Sure, the health of the general public is a concern, but we can spare a few lung cancers to keep Paris cool, right? Apart from cigarettes, all that France would have left to be known for is red wine and arrogance.

Come to think of it, I'm wondering what Johnny Depp thinks about this. I remember him being vocal about the smoking bans in this country, and now Paris and Germany are lost. He spends some time in France, doesn't he? Or maybe his wife is French. I can't remember. The point is, he'll probably be pissed. And he was friends with Hunter S. Thompson, too, who is dead. If you know Thompson, you're probably like me and suspicious that the two of them entered into some voodoo blood ritual wherein Depp now has a means to contact Thompson's spirit. I would not want to be a French lawmaker, knowing that there's even a slim chance that the ghost of this man might be coming to burn "The Marlboro Man Lives" into my chest with a wood burning kit while I sleep. Eat your heart out, Jacob Marley.

Well, I will probably never go to Paris. I have virtually no knowledge of the language, and there is no foreseeable reason to go, apart from tourism or perhaps an engineering conference. If I go, though, I won't have to worry about making an ass of myself by holding my breath and sprinting down the streets of the City of Love with my nose pinched shut.